| |
| When customers evaluate a self-service solution, the proverbial “tipping point” becomes price rather than value. The assumption used often is that ROI is highest with the lowest cost alternative. But self-service kiosk deployments aren’t simple one-criterion decisions. They are complex decisions of strategic importance. While evaluating value ask the tough questions:
- Is the solution scalable?
At a deployment level of 10 units a vendor may look very good. What about 1000 units or more?
- How will reporting be handled when another service is added? Will the data remain integrated?
For example, if you add a new service to the existing service mix, can that knowledge propagate to all the moving parts – from device, to application front-end to monitoring systems to operational systems like reporting, accounting, reconciliation etc., can you net balance and net settle?
- Does the application interface provide you an integrated view of the hardware data and the transaction data? For a few kiosks, it may not matter, but over time when data and number of kiosks increase, opening multiple applications to trouble shoot is timeconsuming.
- Does the self-service add to marketing clout? Through reduced costs, advanced analytics or engaged customers, the ultimate value of self-service is customer acceptance.

Rule 3
The least cost alternative will not provide the greatest long-term return. |
|
|
|
 |
 |
| Table of Contents |
| |
Self-Service Facts (What is Self-Service?) |
| |
The A-B-C of Self-Service |
| |
Rules for Choosing Self-Service |
| |
|
| |
THE F.R.A.M.E.S. PHILOSOPHY |
| |
Transformational Deployment |
| |
INFONOX Firsts |
| |
How Infonox Can Help |
| |
PASS+ : Your ticket to Profit |
| |
|
| |
Why Infonox ? |
| |
Self-Service Trivia |
| |
Industry Glossary |
| |
| - |
A |
| - |
B |
| - |
C |
| - |
D, E |
| - |
F, G, H, I |
| - |
K, M |
| - |
N, O, P |
| - |
R, S |
| - |
T, U, V, W |
|
|
|
|
|