| Kiosks
and good self-service technology are relatively
new, we continue to learn what works and
what doesn’t. Even though
looks matter, a well-designed application
with good workflow
that runs reliably is more important than
a “pretty Kiosk.” Past self-service
deployments in financial services were an
expensive learning experience because a
financial kiosk is far
more complex than a typical ATM or a typical
HR kiosk that is
enabling browsing in an office, retail location
or branch lobby.
The pioneers in these deployments failed
to break out from the “ATM”
footprint and ended up deploying systems
that cost as high as $40,000 to $75,000
(each) for conducting basic financial transactions
like ATM, Check Cashing, Money Transfer,
etc. And this was just the additional cost
of adding peripherals like Check Readers,
special printers, Bill Acceptors and Phones
on/around Vanilla ATM’s.
Then came the service costs of supporting
these machines in
the field with First and Second Line Maintenance.
Deployers
can pay upwards of $250 per month per machine.
This is just
the recurring cost to maintain the HW system
in the field. The
bulk of these costs can be attributed to
SW that was not
inherently designed for self-service automation
and is
incapable of self-diagnosis and recovery.
Service issues are indeed important since
initial kiosk
deployment can succeed or fail on service
issues alone, forget
software bugs, hardware kinks or connectivity.
But once the early dust settles, the factors
that can help extract maximum mileage from
the kiosk is the application that runs and
monitors them.
Rule 2
Form follows function. The fact that it
will run smoothly is more important than
the appearance of the hardware.
|